top of page

Redefining LP Returns: Beyond the Venture Capital All-or-Nothing Game

Venture capital (VC) investing is a high-stakes game that has fascinated and bewildered many startup founders, particularly those in the Software as a Service (SaaS) sector. The allure of securing VC funding often comes with visions of rapid growth and success, yet the underlying mechanics of VC investments and their expectations can be complex and daunting. In this blog post, we delve into the paradox of venture investors' expectations for outsized returns and the inherent risks and realities that SaaS founders face when entering the venture-funded arena.



Venture capitalists often communicate to SaaS founders that they seek returns ranging from 10x to 100x on their investments. At first glance, this expectation seems excessively ambitious, especially when considering that a VC fund achieving a 3-5x lifetime return is considered highly successful. The rationale behind these seemingly contradictory stances lies in the substantial churn problem within VC portfolios. Unlike SaaS startups, which would face existential threats if they lost 60-70% of their customers, especially those who never converted into paying clients, VC firms operate under a different paradigm where a significant portion of their investments are expected not to yield any return.


The harsh reality is that between 50% and 70% of investments made by venture firms will likely not return any capital to the investors. This outcome is not due to a lack of expertise or diligence; venture capital is a professional field populated by intelligent individuals, rigorous screening processes, and strategic funding decisions. The institutional venture investment model accepts a 50% "failure rate" not as a flaw to be rectified but as an inherent component of its strategy. This approach is predicated on making calculated bets on a few companies that have the potential to achieve exponential growth and become market leaders or "unicorns."


In this high-risk, high-reward environment, the success of venture capitalists is not contingent on the universal success of their portfolio companies. Instead, it hinges on the extraordinary performance of a select few investments. A venture firm that invests in 50 companies might only see 2 or 3 of those achieve the scale and valuation required to deliver the desired blockbuster returns. This dynamic underscores the Power Law in venture investing, where the majority of returns are generated by a small fraction of investments. Consequently, a significant portion of VC investments are essentially "churned," contributing nothing in terms of returns.


For founders, the implications of accepting venture capital are profound. VC funding is essentially an all-or-nothing proposition, where success is defined by achieving rapid, sustained growth and becoming one of the few standout successes in the investor's portfolio. This model necessitates a clear understanding and alignment with the expectations and business models of their VC partners. Founders must recognize that to justify the high risk and capital investment, they must aim for growth rates of 100% or more over 5-7 years to achieve the outsized returns that venture investors seek.


Given the stringent and somewhat daunting requirements for VC-backed success, the question arises: Is this the right path for every SaaS founder? The answer lies in a deep understanding of the venture capital game and a candid assessment of one's ambitions, capabilities, and tolerance for risk. This awareness is crucial not only for founders but also for the broader ecosystem of advisors, mentors, and angel investors who guide and support startups.


Conclusion

Understanding the realities of VC investment and the high stakes involved leads to a critical reflection on alternative paths to growth and success. This is the driving force behind the creation of openfor.co/capital, an initiative aimed at providing SaaS founders with an alternative route to scaling their businesses. By offering a platform that aligns more closely with the needs and realities of SaaS startups, openfor.co/capital seeks to empower founders with the resources, support, and flexibility required to grow at their own pace, without the pressures and constraints of traditional venture capital models. This approach underscores a commitment to redefining success in the startup world, prioritizing sustainable growth, founder well-being, and long-term viability over the binary win-lose scenarios often associated with VC funding. In doing so, openfor.co/capital represents a bold step towards a more inclusive and founder-friendly startup ecosystem.



Disclaimer

Please be aware that the content provided in this blog post is intended purely for informational and educational purposes. It does not constitute professional investment advice, nor should it be taken as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any particular investment or financial product. Decisions regarding investments should be made thoughtfully, considering personal financial goals and circumstances, and ideally, in consultation with a financial professional. The creators and publishers of this content will not be held responsible for any financial losses or damages incurred as a result of acting on information found herein. It's important to note that investment markets are subject to change, and past performance does not guarantee future returns. Therefore, the suitability of any investment strategy or opportunity mentioned in this blog may vary from individual to individual. Opinions and analyses included in this content are personal to the author and do not reflect the position of any associated organizations or institutions.

1 view0 comments

Comentarios


bottom of page